Thursday, May 19, 2022

COVID-19: Travel agent sues clients for $5,000 airfare after Air Canada cancels – Vancouver Sun

Must Read

The Civil Resolution Tribunal ruled there had been a “frustration of contract” because the COVID pandemic made it impossible for the B.C. family to fly home on their original return flights almost a year ago.
A B.C. couple stranded for two months in India at the beginning of the COVID pandemic by Air Canada were shocked when their travel agent sued them for $5,000 for the unused flights.
“I was shocked the way he said he was suing us,” said Harman (Harry) Waraich.
Their legal defence — called frustration of contract — is a rare occurrence in protecting consumer rights because “frustration is very hard to reach,” said Vancouver lawyer Flora Griffiths. “For a consumer, it will be of limited help.”
But for the Waraichs, it was successful. Harman, who drives truck on the night shift, and his wife, Sandeep, flew with their two teenagers to Punjab in February, before international travel bans were announced.
They paid Sohi Vacations of Surrey almost $6,600 for the four return trip flights, on Feb. 19, 2020, returning March 28, 2020.
But two days after a global pandemic was declared, on March 11, 2020, Air Canada cancelled the return flight. Sohi Vacations charged the family $1,700 to rebook a May 4, 2020, flight. That was rescheduled to May 18, 2020, before being cancelled outright.
“It was very stressful,” said Waraich. “We just wanted to get home.”
India didn’t allow Air Canada to fly from India and the family paid $6,600 to get on a KLM “rescue flight” to Toronto, on May 19, 2020, then paid more to fly to Vancouver.
The Cloverdale couple called the travel agency “so many times” when they returned to request a refund for the return flights and the $1,700 rebooking fee, totalling $5,000.
In July, the Waraichs’ credit card company agreed to a $5,000 refund because they had not received the services — the return part of the flight.
Waraich offered to split the cost of the flights with Sohi Vacations, and accept a $2,500 travel voucher “because I didn’t want the stress.”
But Sohi owner Sunil Sharman, refused, demanding the full $5,000. Sharman took the Waraichs to small claims court.
B.C.’s Frustration of Contract Act deals with a contract that can’t be carried out because of “an unforeseen event for which neither party was at fault,” wrote the Civil Resolution Tribunal’s Julia K. Gibson in dismissing the Sohi claim . Both “parties are relieved of their obligations under the contract.”
That frustration of contract would also “discharge Sohi’s obligations to provide return flights,” she wrote.
Sohi Vacations said the couple was offered a flight voucher but there was no evidence of one and “there was no certainty as to when such travel could occur,” wrote Gibson.
During COVID, a couple who planned to marry at Chilliwack Golf and Country Club, sued for return of their deposit under frustration of contract, but because the club offered an alternative date, the contract wasn’t frustrated, Gibson wrote.
Sohi owner Sunil Sharman said, “We’re not satisfied with it (the decision). We are still following this up with authorities.” He would not comment further.
An online article by Lawson Lundell lawyers, including Griffiths, says contractual obligations need to be “permanent and not just temporary or transient” for the frustration argument to be successful.
They noted “most effects of the COVID-19, such as illness, quarantine, travel restrictions, shuttering of businesses or schools, or working from home, seem temporary.”
An exception would be “if time is of the essence for the performance of a fundamental term in a contract.”
“It’s good news for passengers,” said Gabor Lukacs, president of Air Passenger Rights . “They have to keep developing the jurisprudence. It adds an additional layer of defence for passengers.”
He said in the European Union, if a flight is cancelled, everyone gets a refund, and that’s what should be happening in Canada.
Air Canada is not a party to the action and it would be a separate issue if Sohi Vacations were to request a refund from the airline. Sohi could also file a notice of objection and have the case against the Waraichs heard in provincial court.
Sign up to receive daily headline news from the Vancouver Sun, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don’t see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Vancouver Sun Headline News will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notifications—you will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.
365 Bloor Street East, Toronto, Ontario, M4W 3L4
© 2022 Vancouver Sun, a division of Postmedia Network Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution, transmission or republication strictly prohibited.
This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here. By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.


- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img
Latest News

2535 Norfolk County Road 45 On

Have you ever wondered if 2535 Regional 45 Road is for sale? You can read this article formore information....
- Advertisement -spot_img

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -spot_img